Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries


Visitors' Forum

Asian Art  Forums - Detail List
Asian Art Forums

Message Listing by Date:
Message Index | Back | Post a New Message | Search | Private Mail | FAQ
Subject:Imari bowl
Posted By: primroy@earthlink.net Wed, Jan 30, 2008 IP: 66.32.26.170

Dear Friends,

I am seeking to learn more about this bowl-my first purchase of what I believe to be Imari.

Imari bowl decorated in under glaze blue (stenciled) as well as various over glaze colors and gold (hand painted). The piece measures approximately 9 1/2" across, and 4 3/8" tall.

I hope I described the bowl correctly. Is this a rice bowl? How would I describe the shape of the rim-fluted or floral? Does the heavy use of gold indicate 20th century for foreign markets? How might you describe the decoration and coloring? And finally, would someone kindly translate the signature?







Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Thu, Jan 31, 2008

More photos for your review.





Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Greg Thu, Jan 31, 2008

Mark reads: Da Ming Chenghua Nian Zhi, this is a common mark found on Imari / Arita porcelain. The mark is not an indication of age. Dating Imari is not my thing, but, I would put this in the 20th c., Greg

Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Fri, Feb 01, 2008

Thanks Greg for the translation. I would like to add that the gold on the rim has wear.

Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Sun, Feb 17, 2008

I received this bowl and it looks brand new. The bowl was misrepresented as being older than it was. There was no wear on the rim as seller described.

Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Arjan Tue, Feb 19, 2008

Are you sure the blue paint is stenciled? The mark and the rimlines looks handpainted to me (as far as I can see on the pictures). The part in the middle (inside) is a little far but lookes also okay fom this distance. I don't know what you mean with "brandnew" but if one of the experts here told me it is of Taisho periode I wouldn't have a problem with that. I also think it has a starcrack on the bottom (near the Chen-mark)so "brandnew" ..... I don't think so.

Arjan

Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Greg Tue, Feb 19, 2008

I don't think this bowl is brand new either, granted I am not seeing wear on the decoration, but it does appear there is some foot wear, I still believe this is 20th c. but not "brand new"....Greg

Subject:Re: Imari bowl
Posted By: Primroy Tue, Feb 19, 2008

Thanks for your astute observations. There is indeed a star crack on the bottom that I had not noticed. What would have caused such a crack? I believe you are correct about the hand painting, but I thought things were hand painted even today to resemble older pieces. A quarter inch of the rim is without glaze right where the beveled edge starts. The unglazed porcelain looks spotted.


Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries |