Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries |
Visitors' Forum |
Message Listing by Date: |
|
Message Index |
Back |
Post a New Message
| Search | Private Mail
| FAQ
|
Subject:Porcelain mark
Posted By: Raest Wed, Jul 12, 2017 IP: 193.165.94.174 Hello, |
Subject:Re: Porcelain mark
Posted By: Bill H Thu, Jul 13, 2017 Until all of the porcelain piece is shown, it is difficult to say whether it is Chinese or not. |
Subject:Re: Porcelain mark
Posted By: Raest Thu, Jul 13, 2017 Thanks for the reply! |
Subject:Re: Porcelain mark
Posted By: Bill H Fri, Jul 14, 2017 Yes, the freehand mark is that of a lingzhi fungus, symbolic of longevity. The form on Raest's shard is consistent with marks used on blue & white wares made during the Kangxi Reign (1662-1722) and bears a resemblance to photos of shards unearthed at Jingdezhen kiln sites that were active during that period. Source photos are published in: |
Subject:Re: Porcelain mark
Posted By: Raest Fri, Jul 14, 2017 Thanks alot to both of you for replies! |
Subject:Re: Porcelain mark
Posted By: casper Thu, Jul 13, 2017 I might be wrong, but its looks like sloppy version of Lingzhi fungus mark from Qing. Being more specific Kangxi period. (1662-1722), those style of mark among with the others developed during the early Qing dynasty, up until the early 1680, when use of reign marks on porcelain was restricted in various ways. |
Asianart.com | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries | |