|
Subject:Re: tang buddhavistta
Posted By: Anthony M. Lee Mon, Jul 28, 2003
I would be uncomfortable dating this piece to the Tang dyansty for several reasons. The general movement of the body is uncharacteristic of Tang tribhanga stance and is more of a full sway which is really a much more MIng to QIng period form. The head is oddly large for the image and not in keeping with Tang proportions. The position of the hand is a little awkward and does not flow, nor does it leave the confines of the stone block suggesting a later style of carving more connected with ivory and bamboo, than stone. Finally, I have seen many Wei to Tang-style Buddhas, Lokapalas and Stelae carved in this particular stone, all new in my opinion, and am very sceptical of works showing this material. It is much easier to carve than real marble and holds details easily, but is porous and chalky and not a lasting stone due to the inconsistent conglomeration and fissures.
Anthony M. Lee
Asian Art Research
|