Asian Arts | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries | Message Board |
AsianArt.com Main Forum |
Message Index |
Back |
Post a New Message
| Search | Private Mail
| FAQ
|
Group: Message Board |
Re: Re: more pictures |
Posted By: JLim Posted Date: May 14, 2013 (03:54 AM) |
Message Dear Matos That is not the impression I got from your initial comment. I don't think you are being entirely straightforward. But be that as it may. As for my opinion: this object is not Xuande in origin. An object like this from the Guangxu period would not be "a excellent antique" as you claim; but this piece does not even have that distinction! This object is a brand new fake. Notice the cartoony shape of the dragon's red claw, and the reflections show that the enamel has absolutely no wear but is still "gritty". I have seen fakes very, very similar to this in shops around Sydney Australia. It seems to be a popular current subject for fakers. Sorry Jay. Matos, if you can see something I can't then please inform, and I will withdraw my criticism. Regards J.Lim Post a Response |
Responses: |
|
Asian Arts | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries | Message Board |