|
Subject:Re: Buddha from Burma?
Posted By: Andreas Wed, Jun 14, 2006
Hi Dan,
thanks for your interest, fyi I used to live and work in Thailand many years. I know a guy for years(karen tribe, friend of may nanny..) who buys staff in Burma and then sells in BKK (not allways knowing what he got himselve, others then he gets his stuff from farmers etc. - not professional) - so far he was reliable and honest, allways explaind what is old, new or even fake. In this case he said it is a minimum of 100 years, Shan period but could be older - but he does not realy know.
I agree the left one (no 1) looks like some work has been done recently ... hands in particular look to sharp - however overall both pieces do not show the usual give away signs of new treated to look old... face is in the same condition as the rest, tip of No. 2 broken and face flat, fyi they are not marple it is limestone and quite soft... no 2 is better made, body has more proportions and structure.
Not sure this helps but I would like to know your view.
Ernes,
finesse is not nesessarily a sign of old origin this one is more sort of naive and as this material is soft with missing structure ... however, just guessing.
Thanks
Andreas
|