Asian Arts | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries | Message Board |
Message Listing by Date: |
|
AsianArt.com Main Forum |
Message Index |
Back |
Post a New Message
| Search | Private Mail
| FAQ
|
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Sun, Dec 05, 2010 IP: 24.166.17.156 Hello, |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Patrick Norton Tue, Dec 07, 2010 260. Mark: Qianlong Nian Zhi - "Qianlong Period, Made", 1970. |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Tue, Dec 07, 2010 Thank you very much, Patrick. Now that I've looked back at my notes, I had written down the name of that mark as well. However, I've done so much web browsing on the subject lately, that it is all starting to turn into jumbled chaos in my mind. |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Tue, Dec 07, 2010 Also, is Kung synonymous with "Huang"...I believe it says, "Dun" before Huang on the inside sticker? |
![]() |
Subject:Re: Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Bill H Tue, Dec 07, 2010 There's no phonetic correlation between Kung and Huang. |
![]() |
Subject:Re: Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Thu, Dec 09, 2010 Thank you for the clarification, Bill. And please forgive my ignorance on the matter. ;-) |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Tue, Dec 07, 2010 Patrick, after looking at the mark you posted, I noticed that it is very blurry in nature; the characters sort of run together, by comparison to the concise nature of the mark on my vase. I don't know if that makes any difference on the estimate of age? Just thought it might be worth pointing out. |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Patrick Norton Wed, Dec 08, 2010 Without having the vase in my hands it is hard to tell. Chinese famille porcelain vases have good value even brand new. This pair in my photo are marked Jingdezhen with the same basic style at 12 inches high. These are newer vases marked Zhong Guo Jingdezhen Zhi quinlong mark, but are from (1970's) and retail value is about $300.00 for the pair. |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Thu, Dec 09, 2010 Thank you for the input, Patrick. Do you think it's worth having the vase looked at by someone who would know for sure? (I'm completely new at how one goes about these things.) |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Thu, Dec 09, 2010 It's too bad that spam is a problem on here...because it would be great if the posting in this forum was in real time. :-) |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Patrick Norton Thu, Dec 09, 2010 The size makes a differance to a buyer and the use of the item. I also have large floor vases and it just depends on buyers needs. This one is 23 inches and marked qianlong Jingdezhen; made in 1970's I just prefer the art from Jingdezhen. Value about $130.00 |
![]() |
Subject:Qing Dynasty Vase...Qianlong Period?
Posted By: Shelley Mon, Dec 06, 2010 Edit: "yuyong" mark. |
Asian Arts | Associations | Articles | Exhibitions | Galleries | Message Board |