Message
Dear Matos
That is not the impression I got from your initial comment. I don't think you are being entirely straightforward. But be that as it may.
As for my opinion: this object is not Xuande in origin. An object like this from the Guangxu period would not be "a excellent antique" as you claim; but this piece does not even have that distinction!
This object is a brand new fake. Notice the cartoony shape of the dragon's red claw, and the reflections show that the enamel has absolutely no wear but is still "gritty".
I have seen fakes very, very similar to this in shops around Sydney Australia. It seems to be a popular current subject for fakers. Sorry Jay.
Matos, if you can see something I can't then please inform, and I will withdraw my criticism.
Regards
J.Lim
Note that we are now reviewing postings before posting due to the large volume of SPAM and inappropriate postings on the forum. The validation process may take up to 12 hours. |
|